API testing tutorial: Understanding API testing types, frameworks, and tools

Unfortunately, digital communications frequently break down. Applications stumble, e-commerce platforms crumble, and critical systems fail at the most inconvenient moments — it's a very real scenario that businesses face daily. APIs now power 57% of web applications, yet 94% of respondents report experiencing API security problems. More alarming? Only 11% of companies have a comprehensive API security and testing plan!

In this article, we'll dive deep into API testing — exploring its types, challenges, and major goals, and uncovering strategies that transform potential vulnerabilities into robust digital experiences. We'll journey through the world of API frameworks, understand API quality, and equip you with insights to protect your technological investments.

‍

Why a robust API testing strategy is a maker or breaker of your business

At its core, API testing is the process of evaluating the functionality, reliability, performance, and security of application programming interfaces. And the advantages of API testing are very noticeable — judging from the fact that it’s now practically everywhere.

The significance becomes crystal clear when we examine industry data. Since 2020, the retail and travel sectors led the API revolution, generating 34% of all API calls. Beyond volume, the strategic value is profound: over 50% of retailers believe APIs accelerate innovation. And since 85% of buyers want multiple payment methods, payment API integration is an absolute must.

But the travel sector isn’t the only user of APIs. According to Skift, in 2024, 36% used OTAs to make flight bookings. OTAs were also used for reserving hotels (43%) and booking travel packages (38%). And all of this is enabled by API: they power the connections between OTAs and providers, and the more widespread they are, the more important it is to keep them secure. So no doubt: travel API integration expertise is now an important part of a hospitality tech stack.

However, the cost of neglecting the challenges in API testing is astronomical. The average expense to remediate API incidents in the United States stands at as much as $591,404. In financial services, this figure escalates to $832,801 — a price tag that would make any business leader sit up and take notice. The price of error is high — but how to make sure you prevent issues before they occur? First, let’s sort out the main objectives of testing APIs.

Key objectives of API testing

API testing is a comprehensive approach to evaluating software interfaces that goes beyond simple functionality checks. It's a nuanced process that examines how different software components communicate, interact, and perform under various conditions. 

The primary objectives of API testing include:

• Functionality verification: Ensuring the API performs exactly as designed.
• Performance assessment: Measuring response times and system load capabilities.
• Security validation: Identifying potential vulnerabilities and access control issues.
• Reliability confirmation: Verifying consistent and stable operation across different scenarios.

Interestingly, API testing is best described as "grey-box testing" — a unique approach that blends external and internal perspectives. Unlike pure black-box testing (which examines only the user interface) or white-box testing (which delves into internal code structures), API testing requires a holistic understanding of both external interactions and internal mechanisms.

So the benefits of API testing are clear. It ensures your app runs smoothly by catching bugs early, improving performance, and verifying seamless communication between services, examining each part of the connections, and the possible implications for users. How varied is API testing? Let’s now understand the common types.

Types of API testing

When it comes to building reliable software, testing your APIs is like giving your car a thorough inspection before a long road trip. You want to make sure everything works perfectly, from the smallest nuts and bolts to the overall performance. Let's explore the different ways we test APIs to ensure they're ready for the real world.

• API functional testing.

First, we have functional testing — examining the core capabilities of an API. It systematically checks whether each function performs exactly as designed, verifying input-output relationships and error-handling mechanisms.  This includes positive testing (checking if things work when used correctly) and negative testing (making sure things fail gracefully when used incorrectly). After all, we need APIs to handle perfect scenarios and surprises.

• API unit testing.

Moving deeper, we dive into unit testing, where we examine each component in isolation. Testers review individual endpoints and isolated functions, ensuring each unit operates independently and correctly before integration.

• API performance testing.

Performance testing comes in several flavors. Load testing gradually increases user traffic to see how the system handles growing demand. Stress testing pushes things even further, deliberately overwhelming the system to find its breaking point. And spike testing? Well, that's like suddenly filling a quiet road with rush hour traffic to see how well traffic control systems adapt. This test verifies whether the API can stabilize and return to normal functioning after unexpected traffic surges or drops.

• API security testing.

Security testing protects against potential digital vulnerabilities. For instance, penetration testing simulates external attacks to identify potential security weaknesses. Testers attempt to breach the API's defenses, mimicking real-world cyber threat scenarios. Fuzz testing takes this a step further by bombarding the API with random data to identify potential crashes, overflows, or unexpected system behaviors under extreme conditions.

• API integration testing.

Integration testing ensures all these separate pieces work together harmoniously. It validates that APIs effectively exchange data and maintain functionality across various systems and platforms.

• API validation testing.

Validation testing comprehensively evaluates the API across multiple dimensions. It doesn’t just tell how well the API works, but how well it serves its intended purpose. This comprehensive evaluation looks at everything from user experience to compliance with security standards.

In testing API, there’s a partial focus on interface and user experience. However, there’s a difference between API vs UI testing. While UI testing focuses on user interface and visual elements, API testing delves deeper: examines backend functionality, validates communication protocols, ensures data exchange integrity, and tests system interactions beyond visual representations. So prioritizing API testing vs UI testing depends on the specifications and requirements of your application.

Common issues detected by API testing

APIs are the digital communication highways of modern software, but like any complex system, they're prone to various issues that disrupt smooth operations. Let's explore the most critical challenges that API testing helps uncover.

• Missing or duplicate functionality.

Imagine ordering a pizza and finding key ingredients absent or duplicated. In API, this translates to missing endpoints or redundant functions that create more confusion than convenience. Here’s where API integration services are invaluable to ensure your developers don’t encounter functionalities that are either incomplete or unnecessarily replicated (which complicates processes daily).

• Improper messaging.

In APIs, unclear messaging is like a GPS giving vague directions. When error messages fail to provide meaningful insights, developers are left deciphering codes instead of solving problems. This becomes particularly challenging in web services automation testing, where communication means the difference between quick resolution and hours of frustrating troubleshooting.

• Data integrity issues.

Inconsistent data formats, outdated information, or incomplete datasets can derail entire systems. Think of it like receiving a partially completed puzzle – frustrating and ultimately unusable. Robust API test cases are crucial for identifying these data discrepancies before they cause significant operational disruptions.

• Unauthorized access vulnerabilities.

APIs have complex exclusive security protocols. When these protocols fail, it's equivalent to leaving the front door wide open for uninvited guests. Unauthorized access leads to data breaches, system compromises, and security risks. This is precisely why API testing is important – it acts as a bouncer, checking credentials and preventing unwanted intrusions.

• Performance bottlenecks.

Performance issues in APIs are like rush-hour traffic on a single-lane road. Slow response times, frequent timeouts, and data processing delays bring even the most sophisticated applications to a crawl. Understanding how to write API test cases that simulate various load conditions helps developers identify and mitigate these performance challenges before they impact end-users.

• Inconsistent error handling.

Imagine playing a video game where losing generates completely random and unpredictable responses. Inconsistent error handling in APIs creates a similar sense of confusion. Developers need clear, standardized error messages that provide actionable insights, making API examples for testing critical for establishing reliable communication protocols.

By carefully considering each aspect of testing, we can build APIs that not only work well today but continue to perform reliably long into the future. Now that we know the types and main targets, let’s unveil the details of API automated testing and manual strategies.

‍

What is API automation vs manual testing? 

Manual testing is the Swiss Army knife — versatile and adaptable, requiring human skill and intuition. Automated testing? It's the laser cutter — precise, incredibly fast, and designed for repetitive, complex tasks. 

The core differences run deeper than just execution. The question of how to write manual test cases for API testing involves human creativity and contextual understanding. In contrast, API automation frameworks are all about systematic, repeatable processes. Manual testing allows for exploratory investigation, uncovering nuances that slip past automated scripts. Automated testing, however, provides lightning-fast, consistent validation across hundreds of scenarios.

Manual testing shines in situations requiring critical thinking and adaptability — like when you're dealing with complex business logic or exploring edge cases that might not be obvious at first glance. Automated testing, while powerful for regression testing and continuous integration, often struggles with visual verification and subjective assessments.

The human element in manual testing also brings invaluable benefits for usability and understanding the real-world impact. However, manual testing can be emotionally taxing on testers, especially when dealing with repetitive tasks, while automated tests are consistent regardless of the time of day or complexity of the test suite. Additionally, manual testing allows for immediate feedback, while automated tests require a structured approach to making fixes.

How API automation testing and manual testing work

Manual test cases for API testing are crafted through direct human interaction. Testers use tools like Postman (we will explore it later) to send individual requests, examining each response with a keen eye. They'll explore edge cases, validate error handling, and leverage their technical intuition to uncover hidden vulnerabilities.

How does automated testing operate? API automation transforms testing into a streamlined, efficient process. Developers create scripts that run extensive test scenarios in minutes. The best API automation testing tools generate comprehensive reports, validate multiple parameters, and integrate seamlessly with continuous development pipelines.

Successful API testing isn't just about running through a checklist. It's about understanding how each type of testing contributes to creating a robust, reliable system. This said, let’s try to understand where to apply each of these types of testing.

Manual and automated API frameworks: where to use each type

Manual testing excels in scenarios demanding deep human insight. Early-stage API development, complex user experience testing, and intricate business logic benefit most from this approach. It's perfect for understanding nuanced interactions that automated scripts might overlook.

Automated testing API strategies shine in large-scale, repetitive testing environments. Continuous integration, performance validation, and extensive regression testing become dramatically more efficient. API examples for testing are quickly validated across multiple scenarios with minimal human intervention.

The most powerful approach often combines both methodologies. Start with manual exploration, then transition to automated validation. This hybrid strategy ensures comprehensive coverage while maintaining the flexibility of human insight.

‍

API testing and API monitoring: Two sides of the same coin

Think of API testing and API monitoring like the pre-game preparation and live performance of a band. Testing is the rigorous rehearsal backstage, while monitoring is the real-time performance tracking once you're on stage.

API testing occurs during the development phase, similar to a comprehensive health check before the API goes live. It's like a dress rehearsal where developers meticulously examine every potential scenario, checking functionality, performance, and security. The goal is to identify and resolve potential issues before the API faces real-world challenges.

API monitoring, on the other hand, is the guardian watching over the API after deployment. It's the continuous process of tracking performance, detecting errors, measuring response times, and ensuring the API maintains its promised reliability in live environments. To see the difference in detail, just look at this concise table breaking down all the aspects:

Combining approaches to ensure API quality

API testing ensures every component works perfectly in the workshop, while API monitoring tracks its performance during the actual performance. Together, they create a robust system. For instance, in AI integration for CRM software, testing might validate the initial API connection and data flow. Monitoring then ensures that the AI continues to process customer interactions efficiently, detecting any latency or unexpected behavior in real-time.

Performance isn't just about functionality—it's about experience. An API that technically works but takes ten seconds to respond isn't truly functional. API frameworks help create robust systems, but continuous monitoring ensures they maintain peak performance.

The most effective approach combines thorough testing with comprehensive monitoring:

• Develop robust test cases during the development phase.
• Implement continuous monitoring in production.
• Create feedback loops that inform future development.
• Use insights from monitoring to refine testing strategies.

API testing and API monitoring are not competing processes but complementary strategies. They work together to ensure that your digital infrastructure remains reliable, performant, and user-friendly.

‍

Exploring the best API testing tools and frameworks 

API testing is a critical checkpoint that ensures seamless communication between different software applications. Crafting a robust API test plan involves more than just running a few checks. It requires a strategic approach that encompasses various API testing test cases, each designed to probe the system's functionality, reliability, security, and performance. Let's explore the most powerful solutions that are simply the best API examples for testing.

What are API tools we recommend? Let’s explore the list of the top tools and frameworks for API testing, discover their main strength, latest features and updates, as well as the pricing so you can make an informed decision. 

• Katalon Studio.

Recognized by Gartner for three consecutive years, Katalon Studio stands out in the API frameworks landscape. This comprehensive tool shines with its user-friendly interface and productivity-focused features. Key strengths include support for REST and SOAP requests, seamless CI/CD integrations, and native imports from Swagger and Postman. 

The platform has recently enhanced its cloud execution capabilities, allowing teams to run tests across multiple browsers and operating systems simultaneously. As for pricing, Katalon offers a range of options from a free plan for small teams up to enterprise solutions at $1,529 per year, with their most popular Professional plan priced at $69 monthly.

• Postman.

What started as a Chrome browser plugin has evolved into a robust API testing automation platform. Postman offers a rich interface that supports both automated and exploratory testing. The latest version (10.6.0) introduces advanced preferences for smart collection organization and scheduled run capabilities. 

Its newest feature set includes enhanced security testing capabilities and automated documentation generation. Postman's pricing structure starts with a generous free tier and extends to paid plans ranging from $14 to $49 per user per month when billed annually, with enterprise options available for larger organizations.

• RestAssured.

This open-source Java Domain-specific language simplifies rest API testing like never before. RestAssured eliminates the need to be an HTTP expert, offering baked-in functionalities for seamless API validation. Its seamless integration with JUnit and TestNG makes it a powerful choice for comprehensive test automation, while its support for all HTTP methods ensures complete CRUD testing coverage. 

Being open source, RestAssured remains completely free under the Apache 2.0 license, making it an economical choice for teams of any size.

• JMeter.

Originally designed for performance testing, JMeter has become a go-to tool for functional API test cases. Its latest release (5.5) comes packed with versatile features, including new themes and enhanced functional testing templates. The tool's ability to display test results in various formats — from charts to trees and tables — makes it exceptionally versatile for different testing needs. 

As an Apache project, JMeter remains 100% free and open source, with all features available to users without any licensing costs.

• Karate DSL.

A game-changer in API testing tools, Karate DSL allows users to create API-based BDD tests without writing complex definition steps. It builds on Cucumber-JVM and supports configuration switching and parallel execution. The tool's parallel execution capabilities significantly reduce test runtime, while its JavaScript integration adds extra flexibility for complex testing scenarios. 

Karate offers tiered pricing with options ranging from $100 per year for the Plus plan to $1400 per year for the Ultimate plan, with a Pro plan available at $640 annually.

• SoapUI.

Dedicated to API testing, SoapUI handles both REST and SOAP APIs with ease. The free package offers drag-and-drop test creation, while the Pro version provides powerful data-driven testing capabilities. Its comprehensive security testing and service simulation features make it a complete solution for enterprise-level API testing needs. 

While SoapUI offers a free version, the professional ReadyAPI Test Module starts at $990, with additional modules like API Performance available at $6,840.

• Hoppscotch.

A free and fast API request generator with a minimalistic UI, Hoppscotch allows developers to send requests and get responses in real-time, saving valuable development time. Its one-click migration feature and robust command-line interface make it particularly appealing for developers transitioning from other tools. 

True to its minimalist philosophy, Hoppscotch maintains a completely free-to-use model for everyone, making it an accessible choice for developers and teams of all sizes.

The market offers a diverse range of best API testing tools that cater to different technological needs and complexity levels. If you want to enhance your in-house manual testing expertise, comprehensive testing and QA services might also become a significant ace up your sleeve. But without an outside expertise, how to choose the right tool? Let’s get some criteria sorted out.

How to choose among the best tool for API testing

Selecting the right API testing solution is more than a technical decision — it's a strategic investment in your software's reliability and your team's efficiency. Let's dive into the critical criteria that will guide your API frameworks selection process.

• Basic API requirements.

When diving into API testing tools, first assess their fundamental API interaction needs. The right solution should seamlessly support the majority of HTTP requests, making data exchange smooth and efficient. Developers look for tools that allow easy importing of settings and artifacts across different projects, saving time and reducing configuration work. The goal is to find an API framework that adapts quickly to changing project requirements.

• Complexity and team skills.

Selecting an API automation testing tool isn't just about technical capabilities — it's about your team's learning potential. Smart teams prioritize solutions with intuitive designs and gentle learning curves, ensuring that seasoned developers and newcomers can quickly become productive. The key is finding a tool that matches your team's current skills while offering room for professional growth and technological exploration.

• CI/CD Integration.

Seamless integration with existing continuous integration and deployment pipelines can make or break an API testing framework. Modern development teams need tools that communicate effortlessly with systems like Jenkins, Bitbucket, and other popular platforms. The goal is minimizing configuration time and maximizing testing efficiency, allowing developers to focus on creating robust, reliable software rather than wrestling with complex tool integrations.

• Interoperability.

Today, APIi tools must do more than just test — they need to collaborate. The best solutions integrate smoothly with communication platforms like Slack, project management systems like Jira, and version control platforms like Git. This interconnectedness ensures testing becomes a transparent, collaborative process that keeps all team members informed and aligned.

• Non-technical friendly approach.

The most powerful API testing tools bridge the gap between technical complexity and stakeholder understanding. By supporting Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) conventions and generating clear, accessible reports, these tools transform technical testing data into meaningful insights that even non-technical team members can comprehend and act upon.

So the choice of your API tool is a very responsible decision. With all the specifications of your systems and technical requirements, you have a choice here: getting an off-the-shelf tool or developing your custom solution. Which is better?

Ready-made API or your tailored solution?

What are the benefits of flying on your own wings in the API context? Developing a custom API testing framework offers developers great flexibility and control. By crafting a solution from scratch, you precisely tailor your testing approach to unique project requirements. This path provides the ability to integrate specialized libraries, implement complex testing logic, and create custom reporting standards. 

However, this approach requires significant technical expertise and substantial time investment. Only teams with strong coding skills and a deep understanding of the best API automation testing tools can truly leverage this strategy effectively.

Ready-made API testing solutions provide user-friendly interfaces, low-coding requirements, and pre-built functionality. While they might not offer the same level of customization as custom frameworks, they compensate with robust community support, quick implementation, and comprehensive documentation. For organizations looking to rAPIdly deploy rest API testing capabilities and integrate other frameworks, these tools are an invaluable resource.

The ultimate decision between a native or custom API integration depends on your team's technical capabilities, project complexity, and long-term testing strategy. Some teams find success in a hybrid approach — starting with ready-made tools and gradually developing custom extensions as their needs evolve. But no matter what approach you choose, there are some general guidelines and principles for success. Let’s break them down.

‍

Best practices for API testing

API testing begins with crystal-clear objectives. Understanding the API's purpose, target users, and complex workflow is crucial. Think of it like mapping out a journey before hitting the road – you need to know your destination, potential roadblocks, and exact route. So now that you’ve hit that mark, where do you move next?

• Establishing the test environment: Creating a robust API testing framework requires meticulous preparation. DevOps engineers configure the digital infrastructure, setting up servers, databases, and resources that will support comprehensive testing. 
• Initial verification process: Before diving deep into web services automation testing, perform a simple trial API call. This quick diagnostic check confirms basic operational status and identifies any immediate, critical issues that might derail more extensive testing efforts.
• Input parameter strategy: Developing a comprehensive input parameter approach is an art form. Explore every possible combination – valid, invalid, and edge case scenarios. Your goal is to create a testing strategy that leaves no stone unturned, revealing potential vulnerabilities or unexpected behaviors.
• Crafting effective test cases: API test cases should be designed with surgical precision. Categorize tests to cover response validations, system behaviors, event tracking, and resource modifications. Each test case is a targeted investigation, probing the API's performance under various conditions.
• Automated testing techniques: API automation testing transforms the testing landscape. Automated tools provide rAPId, consistent execution of complex test scenarios, dramatically reducing human error and increasing testing efficiency. It's like having a tireless, precision-driven testing assistant.
• Performance and security focus: Go beyond basic functionality. Dive deep into performance metrics, security vulnerabilities, and authentication mechanisms. Test not just what the API does, but how it does it under various stress conditions and potential threat scenarios.
• Strategic prioritization: Prioritize your testing approach by focusing on critical functionalities and high-risk areas. Create a hierarchical testing strategy that ensures the most important aspects receive the most thorough examination.
• Continuous improvement: API testing is never a one-time event. Continuously review, update, and refine your test cases. Analyze results, implement improvements, and stay adaptive to evolving technological landscapes.
• Tooling and frameworks: Select best API automation testing tools that offer comprehensive coverage, easy integration, and robust reporting capabilities. The right tools can make the difference between superficial and deep, meaningful testing.

Effective API testing is a dynamic, strategic process that combines technical expertise, thorough planning, and continuous evaluation. It's about understanding not just the what, but the how and why of your API's performance.

However, businesses constantly struggle with ensuring robust, reliable, and efficient API interactions. The landscape of digital transformation demands more than just traditional manual QA testing services — it requires a strategic, comprehensive approach to testing that goes beyond conventional methods.

How we help

At COAX, we understand these challenges intimately. Our team specializes in efficient and reliable software automation testing services that transform how organizations approach API testing. We don't just test—we create comprehensive automation testing services that integrate seamlessly with your development workflow. Whether you're dealing with intricate API architectures or seeking to optimize your testing infrastructure, COAX is your strategic partner in navigating the complex world of software quality assurance.

Our approach goes beyond traditional testing. We leverage the latest technologies and frameworks to deliver innovative solutions that boost your product's quality, reduce time-to-market, and provide unparalleled confidence in your software's performance. From advanced LLM API integration to complex testing scenarios, we provide solutions that identify potential issues and prevent them before they impact your product.

‍

Recapping the API testing tutorial

From understanding the diverse types of API testing to selecting the best API automation testing tools, your teams should adopt a comprehensive approach to ensure robust digital experiences. API functional testing goes far beyond simple functionality checks, encompassing performance, security, and reliability assessments.

Ultimately, an effective API testing strategy is not a one-time effort but a continuous process of evaluation, improvement, and adaptation. By understanding API testing types and investing in comprehensive API testing automation, you protect their technological investments, prevent potential vulnerabilities, and deliver exceptional digital experiences.

So the conclusion is clear: the path forward requires a nuanced approach: combining cutting-edge tools, strategic thinking, and a commitment to continuous improvement.

‍

FAQ

What is the primary purpose of API test cases, and how to write test cases for API testing?

API test cases are critical to ensure the functionality, reliability, and performance of web services. If there were a single bug in an API, it could affect hundreds of services using the same API, frequently impacting millions of end users. According to a study by Dimoski et al., test scenarios should include such test case examples: 

• Happy path testing
• Invalid parameter testing
• Destructive testing with response time validated to be under 1000ms.

How do REST vs REST assured compare in API testing?

REST contains design principles for web services, while the REST Assured framework for API testing is a Java library used for testing XML-based and JSON-based web services. Rest-Assured supports BDD given/when/then syntax and allows for data-driven testing. As Dimoski et al. defined, REST Assured is one of the tools that enables developers to use structured validation approaches for RESTful endpoints. 

What is REST assured API testing's main benefit?

The increase in testing tools has made it more difficult to select the right tool. However, as stated by Martin-Lopez et al., REST Assured provides a domain-specific language that simplifies the validation process of API's via simple code, including support for concurrent execution with extensive assertions for a broad range of valid data and conditions. Overall, REST Assured allows data-driven testing that allows for greater readability and maintainability. 

Can you explain how to structure API test cases examples using modern frameworks?

Contemporary frameworks arrange tests hierarchically in a three-phased approach that consists of phases for authentication, CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) operations, and validating response data. REST Assured tests make use of given().when().then() syntax to create tests readable by humans. Testing tools can be analyzed from three perspectives: manual vs automated testing, black-box vs white-box testing, and online vs offline testing.

What's the best approach to writing test cases when working with REST services?

The best solution is to have full test coverage that includes a happy path, negative tests, and a performance test. Key strategies include:

• Implementing isolated tests for each request, followed by multi-step workflows.
• Proper usage of HTTP methods.
• The use of automated tools such as REST Assured simplifies testing.
• Establishing robust test data management using setup/teardown.

How do you ensure secure API testing at COAX?

At COAX, we address multi-faceted security validations, using OAuth 2.0/JWT as authentication, testing authorization boundaries, and penetration testing for injection vulnerabilities. Our ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification serves as an indicator of our security risk management strategies, while our ISO 9001 certification indicates we have optimal processes in place. Additionally, we have a level of testing that includes verifying data over an encryption method, access control testing, and automated security scanning.